Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Targeted Capacity Building in Beans and Milk Value Chains for Sustainable Value Addition in Uganda


Argentina, Brazil and lately Chile has proven that countries like Uganda with huge comparative advantage in the production of agricultural commodities with well-organized value chains can join the premier league of nations that are well respected and forces to reckon with. Sadly, most of the agricultural commodities, and particularly food staples produced in Uganda, are lost post-harvest due to lack of value added processing.  For instance, only 26% of the total agricultural volume produced in the region is processed post-harvest on average as shown in Figure 1.



Figure 1. Value of post-harvest processing in total value of production.
It has been estimated that the East African Community (EAC) region loses about 30% of cereals, 50% of roots and tubers, and 70% of fruits and vegetables post-harvest.  Because of inadequate value added agro-processing, the region’s exports are mainly in raw form, which means that a high proportion of commodity value does not accrue to the region.  Reversing this trend could improve the region’s food and nutrition security, and help create jobs for the millions of unemployed men, women and youth.

Studies have shown that low value addition in the EAC is caused by, inter alia, weak agricultural commodity value chain development and linkages; low investment in last mile infrastructure (roads, water, energy, telecommunication, etc.); gaps in requisite skills and technological know-how; limited scale economies in production and processing; inadequate financing; limited and unsustainable risk mitigation strategies; inadequate investments in farming, agribusiness development and development of agro-industries; and weak legal, regulatory and governance frameworks.  Even where agro-industries exist, they are often faced with low capacity utilization arising principally from lack of adequate and timely supply of the right quality and quantity of raw materials due in part to low agricultural productivity, poor last mile infrastructure and scattered and small-scale production that increases collection, coordination and transaction costs.

Two commodities, namely, milk and beans are a common denominator in diets in Uganda across different income divides thus good candidates to consider in studying their value chains. Milk and beans prominently feature among the priority staple food commodities with potential for agro-processing in the EAC as shown in Matrix 1.


Commodity cluster
Commodities with highest potential for agro-processing
Potential areas of investment
1. Cereals
Maize, Rice
Post-harvest handling (drying, storage & milling); processing (canning & pre-cooking)
2. Pulses
Beans, Soya beans
3. Fruits
Mangoes
Collection centres, cold storage; refrigerated transportation; packaging, fruit pulp
4. Vegetables
Tomatoes
5. Oil crops
Sunflower, Palm oil
Refining, aggregation of crude oil, contract farming & Mini-Estate Processing Enterprise approach by medium-scale processors
6. Nuts
Peanuts
7. Roots & tubers
Cassava, Irish potatoes
Preservation (intermediary products for better transportation & handling), starch & glucose
8. Livestock
Dairy, Fish
Collection centres, cold storage, refrigerated transportation, fish feed, milk powder & UHT milk

Source: E3AIS (2013).

Sadly, besides cooking at homes and the catering sector, there is no significant value addition to beans in Uganda; consumers also tire of monotonous flavour. Cans on the market are of poor quality. Uganda the leading bean producer in Africa imports canned beans from Italy, Brazil, and USA to mention but a few. Targeted capacity building in areas where Uganda has an edge would be a very good starting point given the resources and organization needed to develop functional value chains. As a result, an increasing number of people are abandoning or reducing their bean consumption despite its documented high nutrient content and health benefits. Prospects of marketing increased quantities of beans and new agro-processed bean products within the EAC markets requires carefully examining production and marketing constraints (increased farm productivity, producer incentives, and access to better markets). Equally important is examining prospects for increasing demand for beans and agro-processed products (understanding consumers’ tastes and preferences, increased consumer awareness of benefits of consuming beans and other value-added products, increasing consumer choices of value-added products, etc.) especially treatments such as de-hulling, soaking, milling, fermentation and germination or malting and cooking enhance the digestibility and nutritional value.

A case in a point is the powder milk production and market. Although the EAC offers a good market for powered milk, it suffices to note that as a region we have practically handed over the market to major players in New Zealand, Australia, Denmark, USA and Mid-Eastern countries that are dry desert sands because any investor seeking to establish powder milk processing capabilities at the local, regional and global level needs to pay attention three issues that are currently to our disadvantage, namely: 1) Capability to deliver at least 200,000 litres of milk per day. 2) Low energy bills since milk has to be stabilized, homogenized, concentrated, spray dried and bed dried. 3) Technological dependence. A reconditioned powder milk line costs in the region of € 1,700,000. A brand new one of any of the three brands of Relloy, Damro, or Carlisle costs between the € 3,500,000 and € 4,000,000. More often than not, Carlisle demands to do a detailed feasibility study themselves, before providing the quotation and the customer has to meet the cost of the study.

Succinctly studying milk and beans to specific targeted capacity building along respective value chain is a worthy while undertaking for DRUSSA fellowship and makes sense to vast majority of farmers and policy makers in Uganda.

Prepared by: Prof. Dr. Eng. Noble Banadda, DRUSSA Fellow

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Building a Research Evidence culture for Public Policy Management in Uganda

The DRUSSA programme has been working with academic institutions and government departments in Ghana and Uganda in order to link the supply and demand side of Research Uptake. This is being done through Symposia, Executive Education courses and a Fellowship scheme that places academics in government departments, allowing in-house government access to research expertise.
 
One of the Southern partners for this activity in Uganda has been the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST), a Government of Uganda Agency, established by Cap 209 of the Laws of Uganda under the Ministry of Finance Planning and Economic Development.
"UNCST acts as a convenor and facilitator as well as a participant in the Policy Symposia, through selecting policy makers and researchers to be invited, guiding the selection of policy relevant topics, contributing to the discourse, and most importantly following up on resolutions"
 
Linked Programme Interventions
The three activities are intricately linked in order to reinforce each other and have a stronger impact; and UNCST plays a critical role in each of them.
UNCST acts as a convenor and facilitator as well as a participant in the Policy Symposia, through selecting policy makers and researchers to be invited, guiding the selection of policy relevant topics, contributing to the discourse, and most importantly following up on resolutions.
 
UNCST organises and co-ordinates the Executive Education Courses by planning the activities in collaboration with the Civil Service College Uganda (CSCU) and The Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC) , and it designs and develops course material in consultation with government Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDA’s). It identifies participants and suitable facilitators and speakers. Finally it plays a critical role in evaluation – assessing the quality of the training as well as following up on the implementation of learning achievements.
 
UNCST coordinates the Fellowship placement through establishing the capacity requirements of the government MDA’s in terms of using research evidence to influence policy making, and coordinating the competitive selection of Policy Fellows. In addition it supervises the Fellows while they are in place, and assesses their progress in building an evidence based culture and promoting the engagement of university academia in the policy making process.
"capacity gaps in MDAs should inform the design of course curricula and course modules should address knowledge and practice challenges faced by MDAs in evidence based policy-making"
Strengthening Impact
 
After 18 months there have been a number of lessons learned in implementing these three activities, and amendments are being made to increase their effectiveness. In terms of the Policy Symposia it is important that the MDAs are empowered to drive symposia agenda for ownership of the process and results. The Symposia should focus on MDA priorities and they should be cascaded in order for there to be systematic progression towards concrete  interventions within the MDAs.
 
To improve the Executive Education activities capacity gaps in MDAs should inform the design of course curricula and course modules should address knowledge and practice challenges faced by MDAs in evidence based policy-making. In addition the analysis of the policy cycle should extend beyond formulation to include implementation and review so that research evidence ‘fits’ the stage of the cycle at which policymakers are considering establishing or changing policy.
 
With regards to the Fellowship, placements the Policy Fellows should primarily act as enablers other than generators of the required knowledge resources for evidence-based policy within the MDAs. They should also mainly focus on providing research evidence required to implement on-going and prioritized policy programs of the MDAs.

Sunday, August 23, 2015



The Development Research Up-take in Sub-Saharan Africa (DRUSSA) Program is committed to strengthening research uptake capacity and participation in the international development research system in 22 sub-Saharan universities across 12 countries. The goal is to improve accessibility and utilization of locally relevant research evidence to inform national and global development policy and practice. DRUSSA also works towards strengthening the capacity of policy makers in Uganda and Ghana to use research evidence. 

The programme seeks to raise the level of discussion around research evidence at senior ministry levels, equip technical staff with practical skills and support senior civil servants as they begin to encourage a culture of evidence-informed approaches to policy making and policy implementation. The programme is hosted by Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST) in collaboration with the Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC), and Civil Service College Uganda.
 
DRUSSA programme will be conducting an Executive Education Course on Evidence Based Policy-making for senior and middle-level officials from policy, planning and other departments with policy related responsibilities within the following DRUSSA Uganda programme implementing Ministries, Agencies and Departments (MDAs): Ministry of Education, Science, Technology and Sports (12)
  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (22)
  2. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (12)
  3. Ministry of Public Service (7)
  4. Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs (7)
  5. Parliamentary Commission (7)
 The course will take place at Civil Service College Uganda (CSCU) in Jinja from 31st August to 5th September 2015. The MDAs which have not submitted particulars of the nominated offi cials  should do so by 26th August, 2015 to the Director, Civil Service College Uganda; Plot 40-56, Kisinja Road,Jinja; P.O. Box 7003 Kampala-Uganda; Telephone +256-414-121657; info@cscuganda.go.ug to facilitate course material and participant welfare preparations.

We thank you and count of your continued support for DRUSSA programme

Sunday, August 16, 2015

CALL FOR PROPOSALS TO PARTICIPATE IN DRUSSA POLICY FELLOWSHIPS




The Development Research Up-take in Sub-Saharan Africa (DRUSSA) Program is committed to strengthening research uptake capacity and participation in the international development research system in 22 sub-Saharan universities across 12 countries. The goal is to improve accessibility and utilization of locally relevant research evidence to inform national and global development policy and practice. DRUSSA also works towards strengthening the capacity of policy makers in Uganda and Ghana to use research evidence. The programme is hosted by Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST) and the Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC).
 
DRUSSA programme is offering policy fellowship opportunities to early career researchers that are based in Ugandan Universities. A series of Policy Fellowships for an academic placement within one of the three government ministries in Uganda have been made available. The participating Ministries are:
•Ministry of Education, Science, Technology and Sports
•Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries
•Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development
 
The Fellows will work closely with policy makers within one of the participating ministries to facilitate the inclusion of academic research in policy development, and to contribute to the fostering of stronger links between academia and consumers of research within government.  The Fellowships will fund six months’ salary for the academic as well as accommodation and travel costs for temporary re-location to Kampala, if required. The Fellowship programme is part of a broader suite of activities being undertaken by DRUSSA to strengthen the capacity of policy makers in Ghana and Uganda to use research evidence and foster greater collaboration with researchers. The programme seeks to raise the level of discussion around research evidence at senior ministry levels, equip technical staff with practical skills and support senior civil servants as they begin to encourage a culture of evidence-informed approaches to policy making and policy implementation. The policy fellows are central to ensuring the success of the programme.
 
We invite applications from academics with expertise appropriate to one of the ministries’ areas of policy interest, to take up Fellowships as early as October 2015. Applicants should have completed a doctoral degree, have a minimum of three years academic experience and, ideally, should have experience engaging with policy making institutions. Applications should include curriculum vitae, with at least three professional references and should be sent by 31st August, 2015 to;

The Executive Secretary, 
Uganda National Council for Science and Technology; 
Plot 6, Kimera Road, Ntinda; 
P.O. Box 6884 Kampala-Uganda; 
Telephone +256-414-705500; 
E-Mail: info@uncst.go.ug.